acum citeva zile am scris despre criticismul cinstit sau
feedback cum ii spun eu
si ieri ma uitam pe diverse articole pe Zerohedge si unul
mi-a atras atentia
se refera la:
One of the hallmarks of totalitarian systems is the criminalization
of dissent.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/criminalization-dissent
iar daca definesti "DISSENT"DREPT CRITICISM
CINSTIT SAU FEEDBACK, atunci vezi, chiar din titlu care sunt consecintele
respectiv apartitia totlitarismului
Germany has been leading the way. For over a year, anyone
questioning or protesting the “Covid emergency measures” or the official
Covid-19 narrative has been demonized by the government and the media, and,
sadly, but not completely unexpectedly, the majority of the German public. And
now such dissent is officially “extremism.”
deci in Germania, cea care a dus nazismul si totalitarismul
la virf, creaza acum UN NOU TOTALITARISM, folosind acceasi metoda de distrugere
a criticismului cinstit, a feddbackului
iar "dissent"-ul este re etichetat drept
extremism, asa ca ORICE IDEE CARE CRITICA ELITELE GERMANE, VA FI PEDEPSITA, VA
FI CATALOGATA DREPT EXTREMISM, iar criticismul cinstit va fi inlocuit cu
pupatul in fund
Yes, that’s right, in “New Normal” Germany, if you
dissent from the official state ideology, you are now officially a dangerous
“extremist.” The German Intelligence agency (the “BfV”) has even invented a new
category of “extremists” in order to allow themselves to legally monitor anyone
suspected of being “anti-democratic and/or delegitimizing the state in a way
that endangers security,” like … you know, non-violently protesting, or
speaking out against, or criticizing, or satirizing, the so-called “New
Normal.”
si dupa citeva sute de ani de "democratie" revenim
la un sistem totalitar propulsat de lipsa de criticism cinstit, de feedback,
ceea ce permite elitelor, prin controlul pe care il detin asupra mass mediei si
internetului SA CREEZE O "REALITATE" FICTIVA, o harta imaginara, si
apoi sa le foloseasca drept indicatori ,,corecti”, iar ORICINE LE ATRAGE
ATENTIA, II CRITICA, SUNT ETICHETATI DREPT EXTREMISTI
ieri parca era un articol in Sputnik, despre raspunsul purtatoarei
de cuvint al MAE rusesc, Zakharova, la atacurile britanice
era parca un citat din Sf, Antonie
citând din Sfântul Cuviosul Antonie cel Mare, care a spus:
“VOR VENI VREMURILE CELE DIN URMĂ CÂND NOUĂ BOLNAVI VOR VENI LA UNUL SĂNĂTOS ȘI
VOR SPUNE: EȘTI BOLNAV, PENTRU CĂ NU EȘTI ASEMENEA NOUĂ”.
https://ro.sputnik.md/Rusia/20210502/34612094/Zaharova-raspuns-Londrei-citat-Sfantul-Antonie.html
iar asta se intimpla acum in occident
in lipsa spiritului critic real, al feedbackului, societatea
occidentala traieste intr-o realitate fictiva creata de elite, si nu mai e in
stare sa intelaga ca este bolnava
iar solutia, asa cum am mai spus e simpla, doar
implementarea e complicata
E NEVOIE DE CRITICISM REAL, cinstit, de feedback, dar mass
media occidentala ca si cea din romania, este bolnava, traieste intr-o lume
fictiva, foloseste niste harti imaginare ceea ce face ca tot sistemul de
conducere, GPS-ul, sa fie incarcat cu date incorecte, cu harti gresite, si ca
atare societatea occidentala este impinsa spre prapastie de elitele lor care nu
mai au nevoie de atita sclavi si slujitori, mai ales ca acum odata cu IA/AI o
mare parte din activitatile sclavilor pot fi facute de roboti si computere
iar acest fenomen de distrugere a populatiei occidentale se
amplifica pe zi ce trece, si in curind ELITELE ISI VOR ATINGE TELUL, O PLANETA
IN CARE VOR MAI TRAI DOAR EI SI CEI CITIVA SCLAVI UTILI
IAR TOTUL PORNESTE DE LA REPREZENTAREA INCORECTA A
REALITATII, DE LA OCHELARII IDEOLOGICI PE CARE I-AU PUS ELITELE POPOARELOR
OCCIDENTALE astfel incit acestea sa nu vada cum sunt impinse spre prapastie ca
niste turme de oi
deci distrugerea acestor ochelari, vederea realitatii,
evitare dezastrului NECESITA IMPLEMETAREA SPIRITULUI CRITIC REAL, A
CRITICISMULUI CINSTIT, A FEEDBACKULUI
YouTube has also created a category labeled “borderline
content” which it algorithmically de-boosts so that it won’t show up as a
recommended video to viewers who are interested in that topic:
“When we deal with information, we want to make sure that
the sources that we’re recommending are authoritative news, medical science, et
cetera
primul comentariu la articolul de mai sus:
you guys really don't get it, do you? MKUltra has been
deployed against the global population
social media created alternate realities for people to
live in. those who are under their control don't even realize they're no longer
here
the matrix is real
din alt comentariu:
Most of the decent stuff is on Telegram / Bitchute /
Rumble and sites that have accounts on
these three sites.
Financialization transforms the functioning of economic
systems at both the macro and micro levels. Its principal impact has been to
elevate the significance of the financial sector relative to the real value
producing sector of the economy; that is to say to transfer income from the value-producing
sector to the extractive sector and thereby increase income inequality and wage
stagnation.
http://thesaker.is/financialization-and-its-discontents/
incep sa citesc articolul de mai sus iar dupa ce m-am uitat
la cele citeva comentarii pare sa fie f interesant, doar ca e lung
the U.S. spends $300 billion too much on financial
services per year, and that the sector needs to shrink by 20%. Harvard
University and University of Chicago economists agreed, calculating in 2014
that workers in research and development add $5 to the GDP for each dollar they
earn, but finance industry workers cause the GDP to shrink by $0.60 for every
dollar they are paid. A study by the Bank for International Settlements reached
similar conclusions, saying the finance industry impedes economic growth and
research and development-based industries.
adica FIRE (Finante, Asigurari si Imobiliare pe romaneste)
au crescut asa de mult in america incit consuma mai multe resurse decit produc
financialisaton is essentially an extractive process
which basically moves wealth from one group to another. For example from
everyday wage earners and productive enterprises to the banking, insurance,
real estate, and other extractive retail and loan industries.
In the earlier phase of capitalism, the financial sector
was much smaller and served to grease the wheels of industry by providing
investment capital and credit obtained from depositors.
asta e rolul positiv al sectorului financiar, de aceea e
nevoie de el
That symbiotic relationship has now ended, and finance
has increasingly taken on a life form of its own relegating manufacturing
industry to the second tier.
dar sectorul financiar a crescut prea mult, cu fiat
money, bani creati din nimic, si din sector auxiliar, a devenit sectorul
principal, cel care a preluat conducerea asupra economiei, si in loc de a avea
un rol pozitiv a devenit un parazit, un sector care extrage bogatia de la cei
care o produc si nu dau nimic inapoi
cam asta e ce face si soros si toti cei care au creat
cazinoul financiar
the rise of the Finance, Insurance and Real Estate sector
– banks, credit agencies, investment companies, brokers and dealers of
commodities and securities, security and commodity exchanges, insurance agents,
buyers, sellers, lessors, lessees and so forth – has now reached such a level
that it has become larger, more ubiquitous, and profitable than productive
industry. Prior to the ascent of financialised capital and the deregulation and
privatisation mania, the role of finance was usually restricted to greasing the
wheels of the productive (value-creating) economy. Commercial banks took the
publics’ deposits and funnelled it as credit into manufacturing and commercial
enterprises. In this regulated environment commercial banks and other financial
institutions were legally circumscribed in the level of credit they could
extend.’
he interesting aspect has been the late 20th century
counter-revolutionary movement predicated on the development of a new bourgeois
class which has effectively established itself inside the financial sector of
the economy and has effectively become a new ruling class ably assisted by a
vast political bureaucracy, the entertainment industry, Big Tech/Pharma and the
media which now plays the role of an organized religious pillar of support to
the existing order.
Ricardo was part of the radical intelligentsia who
believed that history was cyclical rather than linear.
Ricardo saw that the escalator worked with different
effects on different classes. Some rose triumphantly to the top, whilst others,
who managed to move up a few rungs of the ladder could be kicked down to the
bottom; whilst those who got the full benefit of the ride – the landed
aristocracy – did nothing at all to earn their reward – i.e., the power of the
soil and the rent on land.
e interesant ca modelul asta, ciclic cum ii spune Ricardo
aproximeaza f bine realitatea actuala, unde unii avanseaza rapid iar altii
avanseaza incet sau stagneaza sau chiar merg inapoi
e un fel de joc de copii, "Nu te supara frate" 😊
Thranholm says that Western men have been feminized and Western
women defeminized. She says feminists have destroyed men, who are now raised to
be women. Consequently, there is no one to protect white women from the
sexually aggressive immigrant-invaders brought into all European countries by
the anti-white European Union, an enemy of national sovereignty that wants the
destruction of European ethnic nationalities.
The EU is heavily supported by Washington and American money.
http://thesaker.is/the-feminization-of-western-men/
Iben Thranholm says Western men have been deprived of
strength and confidence by feminism. All
over Europe, white women of European ethnicity, French, German, Danish, Swedish
are raped openly in public by the privileged people of color welcomed in by
scum like Merkel, the corrupt French governments, the bought-and-paid-for
Italians, the dumbshit British, and the white men just look away and walk on by
Iben Thranholm says that by destroying manhood, the
feminists have unbalanced society and left themselves at peril. There are no longer any men.
in final acelasi mecanism, lipsa de feedbcak care sa permita
auto reglarea sistemului social, al societatii
tot occidentul, societatea occidentala e in dezechilibru din
cauza ca feedbackul corect, real, a disparut si a fost inlocuit cu manipularea
efectuata de elite prin mass media si internet
iar acestea au devenit uneltele lor datorita proprietatii
private excesive care a distrus posibilitatea unui feedback efectiv
Feedback-ul e metoda de autoreglare a unui sistem.
In societate feedback-ul se manifesta prin discutii libere,
critice sau nu, ceea ce permit societatii a analizeze informatia ca sa se
autoregleze.
In lipsa unui feedback societatea nu se mai autoregleaza si
atunci apar deformatii, dezechilibre care duc la aparitia unor societati
dezechilbrate.
Bogatia individuala este o consecinta a acestei lipse de
echilibru, iar acumularea de bogatii este rezultatul acestei feedback
insuficient sau incorect.
Tot asa cum informatia trebuie sa circule liber ptr a
permite auto reglarea unei societati, tot asa si bunurile materiale trebuie sa
circule liber ptr a permite societatii sa se auto regleze.
Proprietatea privata este o piedica in calea liberei
circulatii a bunurilor materiale ceea ce duce la distorsionarea auto reglarii
societatii.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/J2PPq1j1XGQF/
