319-Fara Rusia ca dusman al occidentului Romania AR DISPARE RAPID

Deci Romania mare a aparut numai si numai datorita fricii occidentului de rusia bolsevica
Fara aceasta frica de bolsevism nu ar fi permis formarea romaniei
Și acum la fel va fi
Interesant
Singurul rost al Romaniei este si a fost in ultimii 160 de ani sa fie o pavaza impotriva rusilor
De aceea exista
Asa ca nu inteleg de ce patriotii se pling ca sunt acum obligati sa isi ia responsabilitatile in serios
Pai e greu
Fara Rusia ca dusman al occidentului romania ar dispare rapid
E usor sa iei pe datorie
Dar e greu sa iti platesti datoriile
Deci Basescu cind ataca rusia e de fapt patriot

Daca ar fi prietena cu Rusia, Romania ar fi dezmembrata pe loc
Deci cam asta e istoria reala a romaniei
si de aceea nu se poate invata cu adevarat la scoala
De aceea trebuie sa fie vicleana

Ca sa se justifice ce s-a luat prin viclenie
Sa se creeze o varianta pe care sa o inghita populatia
Ca sa se lupte contra rusilor
si a ungurilor
si a bulgarilor
si a sirbilor
si de aceea azi nu se spune mai nimic contra ucrainenilor
Interesant
Astia sunt prietenii occidentului
si nu avem voie sa ii suparam
Pe cind rusii sunt dusmanii, asa ca trebuie sa latram la ei
Deci existenta acestei entitati numita Romania depinde doar daca isi platesc datoria fata de occident
Și dacă nu....
Datoria de la sfirsitul primului razboi mondial
Daca nu?
E desfacuta pe bucati

Ca sa se stie... cu cine avem a face

https://medium.com/@ameet/how-romania-got-its-way-at-the-treaty-of-versailles-e5e1dbc5da23#.rd1b5cvwt

Queen Marie of Romania, for example, asked for huge territorial gains, including half of Hungary, for her country. When leaders such as Woodrow Wilson of the United States or Georges Clemenceau of France demurred at granting this, she warned that a disappointed Romania might well have a violent revolution. This was not something that the peacemakers wanted. Revolution in Romania would bring the threat of Bolshevism much closer to the heart of Europe. The peacemakers, it has been suggested by the historian Arno Mayer among others, were heavily influenced by their apprehensions about revolution when it came to making the peace settlements. (source: Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Development Canada)

Queen Marie’s pitch to the Allied Victors was simple: you need Romania to be strong in order to contain the spread of Bolshevism. You don’t want the Russians to occupy Romania and then be on your own borders. So bolster Romania to be your first line of defense against Communist Russia.

The four leaders would hear the pitches from each country delegation, and would use a relatively simple two-point framework to decide whether to award territory, war payments, and arms:
Did the country provide significant help to the Allies in their victory over the Central Powers?
If not, was the country an important military power?

One country—tiny Romania—had neither of these points in their favor. While Romania initially entered the war on the side of the Allies, in 1917, due to military defeats and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia (after which Russia withdrew from the war), Romania was forced to negotiate a separate armistice with the Central Powers.

The situation, however, once again took a turn for the worse for the Entente in November with the October Revolution and the beginning of the Russian Civil War. These events effectively ended Russian involvement in the war, and Romania was left isolated and surrounded by the Central Powers and had little choice but to negotiate the Focsani Armistice, signed by the combatants on December 9, 1917. (source: Wikipedia)

So Romania effectively sat out the last year of the war, and couldn’t really claim that they provided decisive military support to the eventual outcome of the war. Moreover, their military suffered disastrous defeats during the combat, and Romania could not claim to be an important military power in Europe.

Yet despite these challenges, Romania made an effective pitch to the leaders of the four victor countries, and negotiated an outcome that saw them gain significant additional territory, as well as shipments of arms and military support. They not only recovered territory that was lost to Bulgaria, but they also gained additional territory by acquiring Transylvania. How did they do it?

During the discussion, Romania didn’t focus on what they did during the war, or what they had militarily. Instead, they focused on the value they could create for the Allies moving forward.