articol interesant cu
informatie noua
Operation Timber Sycamore is a clandestine operation, and
such campaigns are not owned up to by those sponsoring them — at least, not
typically. In this case, however, the operation has become one of such
magnitude over time that Western powers have had to communicate something about
it, albeit misleadingly.
That is to say, succor to jihadist groups has long
been described by Western government spokesmen as “non-lethal support” for
so-called “moderate” rebels, yet the reality on the ground is that the
“moderate rebel force” that is the Free Syria Army (FSA) has served as a pool
of fighters, weapons and ammunition for the anti-Assad jihadist nebula, whose
tacticians and militiamen were much more effective than the FSA itself.
D ESTE MAI MARE DECA Y
“IN THE HEART OF ANY PIOUS JEW, GOD IS A JEW,” writes
Maurice Samuel in You Gentiles (1924), while to Gentiles, Yahweh must be presented
as THE UNIVERSAL GOD WHO HAPPENS TO PREFER JEWS
The hypothesis that the dual nature of Yahweh (god of Israel
for the Jews, God of the Universe for Gentiles) was intentionally encrypted
into the Hebrew Bible becomes more plausible when we find the same pattern in
the Book of Joshua
To the Jews, Yahweh is their national god, but it is good
for the Jews that Gentiles (whether kings or prostitutes) regard Yahweh as the
“God of Heaven”
asta e ideea
ca Y e doar zeul (god in engleza) evreilor
si ca atare evreii pot fi poporul ales al lui Y
fiindca altfel nua re nici un sens sa crezi intr-un zeu daca
acesta nu te apara, nu te protejeaza
deci Y fiind zeul (god) evreilor e ceva absolut normal, nu
transforma evreii intr-un neam ales fata de celelalte popoare care nu cred in
Y, care nu il venereaza pe Y
asa ca toata smecheria e sa ii faca pe crestini sa creada ca
D, zeul crestin (god) ar fi acelasi zeu (god) ca si Y al evreilor
dar daca D este de fapt zeul universal (god) iar Y estre de
fapt un zeu local (god) atunci ideea de popor ales nu are nici o importanta ptr
crestini
Y e un oarecare ptr crestini, nu este D si ca atare nu
conteaza ce sau pe cine prefera el
este doar un zeu pagin (god) care nu are nici un fel de
drepturi speciale in crestinism
It has worked wonderfully: Christians today believe that the
God of humankind decided to manifest himself as the jealous “god of Israel”
from the time of Moses, whereas the real historical process is the reverse: it
is the tribal “god of Israel” who impersonated the God of humankind at the time
of Ezra—while continuing to prefer Jews.
the true nature of Hebrew monotheism: it was a deception
from the beginning, the ultimate metaphysical crypsis. ONLY WHEN THAT BIBLICAL
HOAX IS EXPOSED TO THE WORLD WILL ZION START TO LOSE ITS SYMBOLIC POWER. FOR IT
IS THE ORIGINAL SOURCE OF THE PSYCHOPATHIC BOND BY WHICH ISRAEL CONTROLS THE
WORLD.
in romana exista o deosebire intre Zeu si DumneZeu
dar in engleza termenul de God inseamna atit Zeu si
DumneZeu, asa ca in engleza articolul e mai usor de inteles
in romana insa zeu si
Dumnezeu sunt termeni diferiti si atunci ideea e mai greu de inteles, respectiv
ca Y si D sunt zeii (gods) dar doar D e Dumnezeu
in timp ce Y e doar un zeu
e mai clar acum?
mai ai articolul despre ashkenazi jews dna de la un institut
american unde spunea ca ei sunt de fapt originari din europa/asia si ca prin
urmare nu sunt semiti
articolul e publicat de
US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health astfel
incit concluziile lui au mai mare valoare decit opinii private
We show that all bio-localization analyses have localized
AJs to Turkey and that the non-Levantine origins of AJs are supported by
ancient genome analyses. Overall, these findings are compatible with the hypothesis
of an Irano-Turko-Slavic origin for AJs and a Slavic origin for Yiddish and
contradict the predictions of Rhineland hypothesis that lacks historical,
genetic, and linguistic support (Table (Table11).
unde AJ sunt Ashkenazi Jews
sau mai clar, Aj sunt non levantini, adica ne semiti
si ca sunt cel mai probabil de origine Irano-Turko-Slavic
iar limba lor, Yiddish e de origine slavica
duminica trecuta pe ProTV la ora 18 a fost un reportaj din
Ierusalim
am prins numai citeva minute dar am fost surprins de faptul
ca asa ceva era prezentat de ProTV
la un moment dat autorul reportajului vorbeste cu un preot
roman care slujeste acolo si care ii spune ca au pus gratii la ferestrele
cladirii fiindca evreii au obiceiul sa arunce cu pietre ca sa le sparga
geamurile
iar in articolul de mai sus sunt prezentate actiuni
asemanatoare ale evreilor din Ierusalim
Back in 2009, the Jerusalem Post reported on the growing
tendency of Orthodox Jews in Jerusalem to spit on their Christian neighbours.
Father Samuel Aghoyan, a senior Armenian Orthodox cleric in Jerusalem’s Old
City, told the JPost “that he’s been spat at by young Haredi and Orthodox Jews
‘about 15 to 20 times’ in the past decade”. Similarly, Father Athanasius, a
Texas-born Franciscan monk who heads the Christian Information Centre in
Jerusalem’s Old City, said he’s been spat at by Orthodox Jews “about 15 times
in the last six months”.
The Israeli professor Israel Shahak commented on Jewish
hatred towards Christianity and its symbolism, suggesting that “dishonouring
Christian religious symbols is an old religious duty in Judaism.” According to
Shahak, “spitting on the cross, and especially on the Crucifix, and spitting
when a Jew passes a church, have been obligatory from around AD 200 for pious
Jews.”
vezi minutul 30 ptr treaba cu plasa la geamurile bisericii.
Niciun comentariu:
Trimiteți un comentariu